![]() RC0102009A0018 dated 17th May, 2009 was registered against the petitioner in view of the huge illegal gratification alleged to have been obtained by him while posted as Director General of Ordnance factories and Chairman of Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata. CBI Court dated 10th December, 2013 emphatically submits that having regard to the gravity of the case and the urgency in concluding the trial of the same which is pending for a long time, the Order of the Learned Special CBI Court allowing the opposite party, who is the principal accused, to travel abroad at this stage shall further delay the trial. Sri Dey in support of CRR 448 of 2014 challenging the said Order of the Ld. CBI Court took notice of the Order dated 6th August, 2013 passed by an Hon’ble Single Bench of this Court in WP No.5919 (W of 2013) in which the opposite party was the petitioner and the Union of India and the CBI were arrayed as the respondents. While directing the passport authority to release the passport of the opposite party, the Ld. The opposite party-accused no.1 was further directed to furnish a bond of rupees 10 lacs. CBI Court directed that the opposite party must inform his itinerary and his contact numbers to the Court as well as to the Investigating Officer and shall remain personally present on the date fixed by the Court. CBI Court relaxed the condition at the time of granting bail by allowing the opposite party to travel to USA for one month. CBI Court) further observed that 'there is a very remote chance' for initiation of trial 'very soon.' Having regard to the fact that the accused-opposite party was granted bail with a condition not to leave India without the prior permission of the Court and the further fact that several other accused persons of the case had availed permission of the Court for travelling abroad and there is no adverse report against such persons, the Ld. The Learned Special CBI Court (for short hereinafter referred to as the Ld. ![]() ![]() While allowing such prayer of the opposite party to travel abroad by relaxing the condition imposed at the time of granting bail the Court, inter alia, also observed that the investigation of the case has ended in a charge sheet and the case is fixed for hearing of petition under Section 239 CrPc. CRR 448 of 2014 has been filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch, Kolkata (for short CBI) as petitioner impugning the Order dated passed by the Learned 3rdSpecial CBI Court, Calcutta in Special Case no.17/2010 arising out of CBI/S.P.E./A.C.B./Kolkata case no.RC0102009A0018 dated 17th May, 2009 under Sections 120B IPC, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13(2) read with Sections 13(1)(a), 13(1)(d) and 14 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short the PC Act).īy the Order impugned no.134 dated 10th December, 2013 the Special CBI Court allowed the application of the petitioner to travel abroad. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |